Including Nuclear Energy for Maryland’s Clean Energy Future
- Alexander Liu, University of Maryland, College Park
- Michael Hou, Johns Creek High School, Johns Creek, Georgia
- Sophie Zhang, Centennial High School, Howard County Public School System, Maryland
- Cheng Guo, West Virginia University
- Chao Wu, Ph.D., Mayland House of Delegates, District 9A
Contact: chao.wu@house.state.md.us
Immediate attention, and long-range nuclear energy planning is critical to achieve Maryland’s current competitive nuclear energy position, commercial growth, and future low cost energy, as well as success in reducing global carbon emission goals. The global warming goals include reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions 50-52% below 2005 levels by 2030, reaching 100% carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035, and achieving a net-zero emissions economy by 2050.
These goals cannot be efficiently and effectively achieved without including new and emerging, safe nuclear energy technology in Maryland’s energy deployment planning.
HB 820/SB 805
HB 820 sponsored by Delegates Wu, Arentz, Buckel, Hartman, Hill, Hutchinson, T. Morgan, Simmons, and Stein, and SB 805 sponsored by Senators Brooks and Klausmeier directs a Nuclear Energy Development Task Force to study and make recommendations on the deployment of nuclear power generation resources and other related technologies in Maryland, and requiring the Task Force to report by December 30, 2025, on its findings and recommendations.
Global Energy Challenge
Looking at France and Germany; France’s reliance on nuclear power showcases a stable, low-carbon energy source that meets energy needs reliably, without the variability of wind and solar renewables. Conversely, Germany’s dependence on foreign resources after shutting down nuclear power plants, notably from Russia, reveals vulnerabilities and risks associated with energy reliance on other countries, impacting energy security, growth, stability, and location of new enterprises.
Status of New Nuclear Energy Development
Small nuclear reactors are not currently being considered in Maryland. Small nuclear reactors are being built other than in Maryland. Current problems in Maryland include the resistance of current suppliers to the current cost of construction. and current regulatory delays. One US company, ThorCon International is building a molton salt reactor to be deployed in Indonesia. Bob Thargraves, President of ThorCon International stated in an interview on December 22, 2023 that there are 2 ½ billion people in energy poverty. It is his goal to provide low cost, safe energy for more people.
PUBLIC SUPPORT OF NUCLEAR POWER
A 2021 poll by the Pew Research Center reports that 62% of Americans support building new nuclear power plants, up from 50% in 2016. Additionally, 70% believe nuclear power is a safe way to generate electricity. Additional public information and education, together with transparent, accurate discourse, will increase informed public support of the need for immediate planning for Maryland’s sustainable, reliable nuclear energy as an important base for its future economy.
Furthermore, more than 1/3 (38%) of Maryland’s power comes from our nuclear plant: Calvert Cliffs, which has been running safely for more than 50 years. This fact indeed increases public confidence of introducing more nuclear power capacity in Maryland.
BENEFITS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
Despite large initial investments, the lifecycle of nuclear power plants, characterized by prolonged operational tenure, high energy output efficiency, and relatively low maintenance costs, makes them economically viable over time. Also, new nuclear technology requires far less land and far less space than wind and solar.
Profitability of Nuclear Energy
Long-term operation of nuclear plants is economically sound due to low fuel costs and stable production rates. The profitability of nuclear energy would be enhanced by supportive policy and market mechanisms that recognize the value of clean, reliable, and base-load power generation.
Reduced Need for Uranium Supply
Advancements in nuclear technology, including more efficient reactors and fuel recycling, can extend the lifespan of existing uranium reserves, ensure a sustainable supply of nuclear fuel for future generations, and resolve nuclear waste storage issues by recycling existing nuclear waste.
Combining and Allocating Clean Energy Resources
Balancing investments between a combination of wind, solar, and nuclear allows Maryland to harness the reliability and zero-carbon benefits of nuclear power while capitalizing on the sustainability, long term lower costs, and environmental advantages of renewables. This balanced investment strategy is essential for creating a resilient and sustainable energy system that meets Maryland’s procurement rules, future demands and environmental goals.
Planning for Reliable, Clean Energy for Maryland’s Future Needs
Nuclear energy provides a reliable, low-carbon power source which is crucial for meeting current and future energy demands while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Planning ahead requires legislators’ knowledge and understanding of new nuclear energy technology, which includes rigorous safety standards and innovative waste management solutions. Inclusion of new nuclear energy technology allows Maryland to reap significant environmental, economic, commercial and energy security benefits.
CONCLUSION
To include new nuclear energy as soon as possible in Maryland’s energy planning is necessary to enable Maryland’s future economic and job growth, and to address global warming challenges, as well as to achieve Maryland’s sustainable and reliable energy goals.
REFERENCES
- Economics of nuclear power plants – Wikipedia
- https://world-nuclear.org/our-association/what-we-do/the-harmony-programme.aspx
- https://energy.maryland.gov/Documents/MarylandEnergyAssurancePlan.pdf
- https://www.mdcleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/MCEC-Energy-101-v2023.pdf
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvert_Cliffs_Nuclear_Power_Plant