PJM price model and your utility bill

Recently there are many complaints across the east coast (13 states falling under PJM, 67 million customers) about the high utility price. MD Senator Katie Fry Hester organized a meeting to talk about PJM price models and data center issue. I am attaching different price models shared from her office.

More slides are saved here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/16s2nfhPeaIx6mQxThpO52nLtZ1lTrnC3?usp=drive_link

A different approach:

I asked a question during the virtual meeting. Could we have a rate-payer centered model? I support having data centers. However, they need to share the cost of building infrastructures.

So the price model starts where considering the price increase will be limited by 3% every year, traverse back to see how much every other user need to pay to increase electricity capacity?

PJM has not done such analysis, or probably they would not. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission should demand to do a study like that.

Another issue always puzzles me: we, as rate-payers, pay energy companies to design, build, finance and run our energy portfolio, what’s the exact power do we have to influence the decision of a private company? Is there anything wrong with this model for affordable energies?

Delegate Chao Wu Re-election Campaign Kickoff (2026)

Join us to officially launch Delegate Chao Wu’s re-election campaign for 2026!

  • Time:  Saturday, 3:00-5:00PM, Oct 4, 2025
  • Location: Howard County Cedar Lane Park, East Pavilion
  • Address: 10745 Route 108, Columbia, MD 21044
  • Speakers:  Maryland Lieutenant  Governor Aruna Miller
  •                    Maryland Comptroller Brooke Lierman
  •                    Maryland State Senator Katie Hester
  •                    Maryland State Delegate Vanessa Atterbeary
Screenshot

Petition to Keep USDA BARC in Maryland

Petition to Keep USDA BARC in Maryland

To:

The Honorable Brooke Leslie Rollins

Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture

Mr. Malcom Shorter, Acting Assistant Secretary for Administration, USDA

Ms. Yeshi Abebe, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Administration, USDA

Email: reorganization@usda.gov

August 31, 2025

Petition to keep USDA BARC in Maryland

We, the undersigned, 21 Maryland State Legislators and more than 300 residents across Maryland, are writing to express our grave concern and strong opposition to the proposed reorganization plan that would lead to the closure and relocation of the USDA Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC). With a proud history spanning over 115 years, BARC stands as the world’s largest and most critical agricultural research institution, providing invaluable scientific contributions that secure our nation’s food supply and drive agricultural innovation.

The proposed relocation threatens to dismantle a century of accumulated expertise, infrastructure, and institutional knowledge. Moving BARC would disrupt ongoing critical research projects and jeopardize the careers of hundreds of dedicated scientists and staff who have made Maryland their home. The economic and social fabric of our local community, built around this center of excellence, would be severely damaged.

We urge the USDA to reconsider this plan and to recognize the irreplaceable value of keeping BARC intact and operational in its current location. Preserving BARC in Maryland is not just a matter of convenience; it is a matter of national importance. It ensures the continuity of vital research, protects a massive public investment, and honors the legacy of scientific excellence that has long defined USDA’s mission.

We call on you to listen to the voices of stakeholders, including the employees who are the heart of this institution, and to halt any plans that would undermine the mission and future of the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center.

The stability, pride and prosperity of research for our nation’s agriculture community lie in your hand and we urge you to keep them where they are now.

Sincerely,

Delegate Chao Wu

Maryland State Delegate, District 9A (Howard and Montgomery Counties)

Exhibit: Co-signers for the petition:

Members of Maryland General Assembly

Senator Jeff Waldstreicher
Senator Cory McCray
Senator Ron Watson
Senator Alonzo Washington  
Delegate Chao Wu
Delegate Aletheia McCaskill
Delegate Gary Simmons
Delegate Kris Fair
Delegate Joseline A. Pe’na Melnyk
Delegate Courtney Watson
Delegate Kym Taylor
Delegate Matthew J. Schindler
Delegate Eric Ebersole
Delegate Ashanti Martinez
Delegate Greg Wims
Delegate Julie Palakovich Carr
Delegate Joe Vogel
Delegate CT Wilson
Delegate Jen Terrasa
Delegate Sheila Ruth
Delegate Jared Solomon

Community Members

Christina Ni
Xuhui Zhao
Yan Zhang
Ping Geng
Mengling Yang
Xiao Dong
Qiang Cai
Rose Li
Qiang HUANG
Zilin Zhou
Ruibo Han
Yixin Qiu
Junmei Tang
Jun Gui
Jeff Sun
Yao Lu
Junfeng Huang
Zhen Wang
Ting lei
Faya wang
Minzhi Liu
Nan Jiang
Cheung Yeung
Sonya Chang
Zachary Lamas
Ju Jiang
Jennifer Lo
Zhenhua Xu
Zoe Zuo
Haichen song
Hongjun Yang
David zhu
Amy Feng
Yi Song
Yaping Wu
Susu Lauer
Kui Zhao
Yingzhe Tao
Hanna Liu
Naili
yingdong yuan
Zejun wang
Jane Tian
Qiong Xu
Lun Li
Feng Gao
Nina li
Jeff shang
Hadassah Bolden
Jacquelynn Tintle
Ligang Chen
Yongguang Han
Jamie xu
Fay tang
Ye wang
Yiming Zhu
Jodi Cohen
Oliver Ha
Ziying Liu
Ray He
Cindy Chen
Hong Hu
Zhiyong Yang
Alan Max
Jian Li
Hong ning
Jon San
Lijun Shao
Jean Xu
Jing tian
Bin Liu
Jiyu Zhan
Yan Sun
Ruhui Li
Hanna wang
Bin Tan
Lili Liu
Mingxian Li
Lu Huang
Shien Hu
Feng Ding
Heshun Wang
Angela Li
Xiang Zhang
Charlie Wei
Min He
Yuzhi Hu
Chen Mei
Yangbing Li
Richard Li
Zhiling Li
Yujie Wang
Lan Ma
Kai chiu
Jiao yang
Kyle Grubbs
Bao Zhang
Bo Sun
Wei Wang
Chong Zhang
Daqian Huang
chung-chi cha
Mark Wu
Jian Yang
Weimin Hou
Xi Zhang
Chen Li
Ariel Zhang
Quansheng Lu
Shang Zhou
Ruili Zhu
Xiukun Geng
Young Wang
Xiaopeng Hu
Jennifer Guo
David Shen
Reggie Zhan
Jean Tang
Yun Teng
Guangpeng xian
Shenghui Yang
Jiarui Dong
Hongling Zhou
Aron Zhang
Ying zhang
Qiuping Zhao
Rick Jiang
Qian Chen
Li chen
Jiangmei Wang
Xiaoxin Hu
Li Zhang
Hao He
Lynne Gilliland
George Gliba
Beverly J. Conner
Tony Qin
Meredith Pyle
Cynthia Sokolow
Jifu Yin
Vanessa Zanin
Lynn McKee
dan gillotte
Huang Gu
Piri Jenkins
Donghui Song
Qiong Wang
Annette W Davis
Lindsey Mendelson
Haiqing Zhao
Xiaojing Qi
Xinzhong Fong
Halcyon Ahearn
Jingfeng Huang
Wenhua wang
Youhua Tang
Patricia Combs
Kevin P Brown
Bin Duan
Haijun Xiao
Aaminah Shah
Olayanju Kunle-Rabiu
Naima Dulic
Jessica Garbarczyk
Elizabeth Christiansen
Meng Gao
Xiwu Zhan
Steve Bolen
Kristen Piggott
Yanming Bi
Zhihao Liu
Bo Xie
Hua Lu
Anne Marigza
Jiachen Zhuo
Kathleen Linkenhoker
Aline Salaam
Tess Jaffe
Cynthia Suen
Chelly Tavss
Xueying Ni
Kristin Stenson
Natalie Ormsby
Xiumin Liu
martin zhu
Cixin Wang
Delia Tang
Eileen   Zeller
Cixin wang
David Karst
Ye Yan
Mei Han
Janice Wolf
Sterling Sanders
Christine Carey
Kathy Bartolomeo
Omar khan
Rebecca H Mayo
Rhonda Kay pavel
Deborah Hope Baggety
Sharon Werth
Jeri Boliek
Brooks Boliek
Jinhua Wang
Tianzhen Ren
John Campanile
Katherine Marek
Yang Yu
Simon Liu
John Ausema
Aileen Kroll
Ro Abdumonaf
Kusuma Prabhakara
Janice Reyes
Warren Young
Janice Young
Ruby Dessiatoun
Grace Fisher
Emily Cheung
Mary Bruzzese
Chris Herman
Jeffrey Harrison
 Virginia Lawson
EllenLee
Lynda Wright
Bethany Hopper
SHARON bailey
Katie fuerst
Kim Rush Lynch
Dianne Wallace
Richard Wallace
Tara Wahle
Amy Lloyd
Benjamin Fischler
Holly Leon-Lierman
Katrina Boverman
Sara Bloom Leeds
Linda Ivy
Joseph Harris
Rosemary Weber
Jacquelyn Waters
Edward B. Fallon
Tara Rice
Julie Boynton
Karen Kay Hess
Heather Norden
Amy Drew
Dr. M. Samuey
Ruth White
Qinghong Shi
Bette Farris
Alicia Deligianis
Carol Bonkosky
Melanie Kalos
Madeleine Jepsen
Yishan Yang
Reina Pinkine
Leah Moore
Michelle Kretsch
Jerry Wang
LaWann Stribling
Barb Ge
Carol Pelosi
Jennifer McGovern
Liz Enagonio
Wendy Hurlock Baker
Dale Wilding
Sandra Stephon
Ann G Polvinale
Barry Bordas
Chidi Obineche
Sydney Golden
Amanda Carey
Catherine Fry
Nicole McCrimmon
Ganyu Gu
Linda Brashears
Sheila Maffay-Tuthill
Suzette Agans
deborah schoenfeld
Matthew Swanson
Brooks Scoville
Kristin Wenzel
Tequilla Taylor
Leslie Valencia
Melinda He
Jeniffer Leon
Julie Harris
Amanda M. Wilhelm
Amy Li
Kristen Weaver
Anne Gardner
Xiaohong Shi
Qiong Zhou
Tina Mattingly
Alison Miller
Talon Bevan
Ben Hollander
Aviva Glaser
Eileen Hollander
Yvonne Fishbein
Adam Fishbein
Brian Frankel
Tammy Becraft
Desmond Jordan Julia Raymond
Gidon van Emden
Miriam Glaser
Leah Hollander
Amy Drew
William Drew
Tiandong Li
Weihua Mao
Carl Carrington
Alice A. Mitchell
Jennifer Lindstrom
Eric Coaxum
Elaine Weston
Misay priest
Sandra L Roberts
Melissa Cardon
Phyllis Oresky
Michael Chapman
Laura L Kressler
Changxing Shao
Melissa Ann Ehrenreich
Carol Sue Nevitt
Kassie Coulson
Suzanne Monthie
Roger S Davis
Harleigh Ealley
Shaela Jones Mecholsky

AI hiring disclaimer from ADP, Part 1/2

AI hiring disclaimer from ADP, Part 1/2

This is the first time I am seeing a company discloses this information. This is great.

The file is here:

A quick summary (using ChatGPT):

1. Artificial Intelligence Transparency Notice

Summary:
ADP uses AI systems—including generative and traditional machine learning—to provide insights, generate responses, draft job descriptions, and make predictions based on both company-specific and general knowledge. These AI systems are constrained to defined use cases, operate in a non-public environment, and are subject to human oversight to ensure privacy, security, bias mitigation, and result accuracy. AI is not universally deployed to all customers. Employers must validate AI-generated content for accuracy and completeness before use.

Pros:

  • Clear disclosure of AI involvement and its scope.
  • Emphasis on privacy, security, and bias safeguards.
  • Requires human validation before application.

Cons:

  • No technical detail on bias mitigation methods.
  • Lack of transparency about AI model architecture or data sources.

Flaws/Challenges:

Does not address potential AI hallucinations or outdated data risks.

“Rigorous methods” for safeguarding privacy are vaguely described.

No quantitative bias audit details here (only in later sections).

2. Candidate Relevancy Overview & Scoring Method

Summary:
Candidate Relevancy and Profile Relevance tools use AI/ML to match candidate resumes with job descriptions based on education, skills, and experience. They produce three weighted sub-scores aggregated into a final score (1–100) or category (High/Medium/Low). Weights vary by job sector and are empirically derived. The system is meant to be one of many hiring tools, without cut-off scores, and does not use demographic or protected information. Employers see all applications regardless of score.

Pros:

  • Transparent on matching methodology (three-component model).
  • Excludes demographic/protected data from scoring.
  • Allows all applicants visibility to employers.

Cons:

  • Weights are proprietary, with no clear rationale per job beyond “empirical” determination.
  • Limited explanation of sector-specific variation.

Flaws/Challenges:

  • Potential misalignment if job descriptions are poorly written or incomplete.
  • Reliance on historical data could encode past biases indirectly.
  • No disclosure on algorithm retraining frequency.

3. Compliance with NYC Local Law 144

Summary:
The FAQ states ADP does not believe Candidate Relevancy qualifies as an “automated employment decision tool” under NYC’s Local Law 144, as it is not intended to substantially assist or replace human decision-making, is not weighted more than other factors, and does not overrule human conclusions. Employers are instructed to use it only as one source of information, not as the sole hiring criterion.

Pros:

  • Clear legal positioning to avoid regulatory classification.
  • Explicitly prevents over-reliance on the tool.

Cons:

  • “Intended use” may differ from real-world employer practice.
  • Relies on employer compliance with intended usage.

Flaws/Challenges:

  • No enforcement mechanism to ensure employers don’t misuse scores.
  • Risk that some users may unintentionally give disproportionate weight to scores.
  • Lacks clarity on handling regulatory changes or broader legal definitions.

4. Bias Audit Results – Candidate Relevancy

Summary:
Independent auditors (BLDS, LLC) in April 2024 found no statistically valid evidence of bias by sex, race/ethnicity, or intersectional categories. Data tables show scoring rates and impact ratios, with small-population categories excluded per NYC Ordinance. Adjustments for Simpson’s Paradox were made.

Pros:

  • Independent third-party audit increases credibility.
  • Transparent publication of demographic scoring data.

Cons:

  • Limited explanation of audit methodology and statistical thresholds.
  • Exclusion of <1% groups could hide biases affecting small communities.

Flaws/Challenges:

  • “No valid statistical evidence” does not mean no bias exists—small effect sizes may be present.
  • Potential year-to-year variation not addressed.
  • Does not test bias in real-world hiring outcomes, only in scoring outputs.

5. Bias Audit Results – Profile Relevance

Summary:
Similar to Candidate Relevancy but displays categorical ratings instead of numeric scores. BLDS audit also found no statistical evidence of bias. Selection rates and impact ratios are provided for “High” and “High or Medium” classifications by demographic group. Small groups (<1% of applicants) excluded from impact ratio calculations.

Pros:

  • Consistent independent review approach.
  • Publishes detailed demographic breakdowns.

Cons:

  • Same methodological gaps as Candidate Relevancy audit.
  • Category thresholds (“High/Medium”) are not transparently defined.

Flaws/Challenges:

  • Translation of numeric to categorical scores could introduce hidden bias.
  • Risk that “Medium” candidates may be deprioritized despite lack of bias evidence in “High” group.

6. Opt-Out Policy

Summary:
Applicants may opt out of AI scoring for a specific job, in which case their score is listed as “Not Available.” This also occurs if technical issues prevent scoring. All applicants remain visible to recruiters.

Pros:

  • Preserves applicant choice.
  • Ensures no one is excluded from visibility due to opting out.

Cons:

  • Opt-out is job-specific, requiring multiple actions for multi-application seekers.
  • No transparency on whether opting out impacts recruiter behavior.

Flaws/Challenges:

  • Potential recruiter bias against “Not Available” scores.
  • Ambiguity on how technical issues are communicated to applicants.

In part 2, I am going to dive into those numbers and have some analysis.

HB1450 final report, HoCo task force to study HCPSS capital revenue options

HB1450 final report, HoCo task force to study HCPSS capital revenue options

Here is the final report. I really appreciate so many people have been working on this issue for such a long time since I proposed this legislative task force in 2024. The billion dollar deferred maintenance issue in HCPSS is a challenging issue and we need continue to find a way to fix it. There may be some hard questions to ask and we should not shy away from it.

One figure is missing: the ratio of county funding into HCPSS divided by total county revenue every year. Here is the unofficial data and analysis by Anthony Debella showing a downwards trend: Analysis of Howard County Maryland Expenditure on Public Schools, FY2009 – FY2025 | Dr. Chao Wu

There should be only one truth

Reading from APA Justice from Jimmy Yang.

Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, Go had overstayed a visa that “expired more than two years ago” . However, Go’s current visa is reported to be valid until December, and her hearing on July 31 was part of an effort to extend her status.

There should be one truth: expired or not expired. There should be only one truth.

Author: Madeleine Gable, APA Justice Communications Associate


According to CNNAsAmNews, and multiple media reports, Yeonsoo Go, a 20-year-old South Korean at Purdue University’s College of Pharmacy, was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on July 31. Five days later, August 4, she was released and reunited with her mother in Federal Plaza in New York.

In 2021, Go moved to the U.S. with her mother on a religious worker’s dependent visa. Three years later, she graduated from Scarsdale High School, located in Westchester County, New York. Go’s mother, the Rev. Kyrie Kim, serves as a priest in the Asian ministry of the Episcopal Diocese in New York and is recognized as the first woman ordained in the Seoul Diocese of the Anglican Church of Korea.

On July 31, 2025, Go attended a visa hearing in Manhattan with her mother, during which a judge scheduled a hearing for October. However, ICE agents arrested her outside the courthouse immediately after the hearing. She was first held at a nearby federal detention site, then transferred to a facility in Monroe, Louisiana. ICE has not provided an explanation for why she was placed in immigration detention.

According to Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, Go had overstayed a visa that “expired more than two years ago” and was placed in expedited removal proceedings. McLaughlin added, “The fact of the matter is those who are in our country illegally have a choice — they can leave the country voluntarily or be arrested and deported.”

However, Go’s current visa is reported to be valid until December, and her hearing on July 31 was part of an effort to extend her status, raising serious questions about the legality and appropriateness of her detention.

On August 2, supporters called for Go’s release during a gathering in Manhattan’s Federal Plaza. Friends spoke of her positive attitude and kind heart, noting that Go had been increasingly nervous leading up to her hearing given the current political climate.

A Purdue University spokesperson Trevor Peters confirmed the university was aware of the situation and that the dean of students had reached out to Go’s family.

Following her release, Republican Representative Mike Lawler wrote on X “Yeonsoo’s case is yet another example of why we must fix our broken immigration system and make it easier for folks to come here and stay, the right way.”

Go’s detainment comes just over a week after Tae Heung “Will” Kim, PhD student at Texas A&M University, was first detained at San Francisco International Airport. Kim spent a week sleeping in a chair with the lights on 24/7, before being moved to immigration detention centers in Arizona and then Raymondville, Texas. Kim was denied access to counsel while he was held in San Francisco.

Karl Krooth, Kim’s attorney, stated that his client’s detention underscores serious flaws in the immigration system. He noted that Kim was deprived of due process protections typically available through immigration court proceedings, and held in an airport under questionable authority. “CBP [Customs and Border Protection] officers are not neutral arbiters — they are interrogators,” Krooth said.

Becky Belcore, co-director of National Korean American Service & Education Consortium (NAKASEC), says Kim’s prolonged detention is indicative of a larger crackdown on immigrants’ rights. Earlier in July, Muhanad J. M. Alshrouf was detained by immigration officials for nine days at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, TX.  Alshrouf had a valid visa and had no criminal history. CBP officials have not provided reasoning why he was detained.

Similarly, CBP officials held naturalized citizen Wilmer Chavarria, a Vermont school district superintendent, at George Bush Intercontinental Airport for hours on July 21, searching his electronic devices. Chavarria was returning from a trip to Nicaragua where he visited family.

On August 8, the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC) addressed a letter to Kristi NoemTodd Lyons, and Rodney Scott expressing deep concern over the treatment of lawful permanent resident AAPI individuals by CBP and ICE. They pointed to several reports in which individuals — Will Kim, Yeonsoo Go, Lewelyn DixonMaximo Londonio, and Yunseo Chung — were detained without due process, suggesting potential violations of constitutional protections.

CAPAC also alleges that CBP has violated its own National Standards on Transport, Escort, Detention, and Search, which requires CBP officials to “hold detainees for the least amount of time required” and, generally, for no more than 72 hours. The cases cited by CAPAC exemplify how CPB has purportedly failed to uphold this code.

The CAPAC letter underscores growing concerns about the protection of constitutional rights, serving as a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and adherence to due process. Upholding these principles helps ensure that enforcement practices remain fair and that the rights and dignity of immigrant communities are respected. 

Breaking News:  According to the Intercept, a 32-year-old Chinese immigrant named Chaofeng Ge died by suicide in the Moshannon Valley Processing Center, a privately run ICE detention facility in Pennsylvania. Ge had been detained there for five days after being handed over to ICE following a guilty plea for a credit card fraud-related arrest. The Moshannon facility, operated by the GEO Group and the largest ICE detention center in the Northeast, has faced numerous complaints about abusive conditions, including poor language services that leave detainees, especially Chinese speakers, isolated.

Ge was found hanging in a shower room early on August 6, 2025, and despite emergency medical efforts, he was pronounced dead around 6 a.m. His death marks the first ICE detainee death in the Northeast this fiscal year and the third suicide in ICE facilities nationwide this year.

The Moshannon center has come under scrutiny for overcrowding, lack of adequate medical and mental health care, and harsh conditions that resemble a prison rather than a temporary holding center. A 2024 Department of Homeland Security investigation found “egregious and unconstitutional conditions,” but its findings were largely ignored after oversight offices were closed.

Nationwide, deaths in ICE detention have increased sharply this fiscal year, with 12 detainee deaths reported as of June 2025—more than the previous year and the highest since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The rise in deaths highlights ongoing concerns over ICE detention conditions and treatment of immigrants.

9 million student loan debt relief tax credit

📣The Maryland Higher Education Commission’s Student Loan Debt Relief Tax Credit (SLDRTC) 📣 program provides $9 million in tax credits to Maryland residents filing their 2025 tax returns. The SLDRTC application is now OPEN and the deadline to apply is September 15, 2025.

“Maryland residents are encouraged to take the time out to complete the tax credit application,” said Dr. Sanjay Rai, Secretary of the Maryland Higher Education Commission. “Any amount received can provide relief by helping to alleviate existing student loan debt.”

To qualify, applicants must:

Maintain Maryland residency for the 2025​ tax year
File 2025 Maryland state income taxes
Have initially incurred at least $20,000 in undergraduate and/or graduate student loan debt
Have at least $5,000 in outstanding student loan debt at the time of applying for the tax credit
Currently be making payments on their student loans
All eligible Maryland residents are welcome to apply for the SLDRTC program. Maryland State employees with student loan debt will receive awarding priority.

Tax credit recipients must prove they have used the full Student Loan Debt Relief Tax Credit amount to pay their eligible student loans. If they cannot, they will be expected to return the credit.

To view a list of frequently asked questions and information on how to apply, visit https://mhec.maryland.gov/preparing/pages/studentloandebtrelieftaxcredit.aspx

Pepco Customer Relief Fund

Pepco Customer Relief Fund

Eligibility

The Customer Relief Fund is available for qualified residential customers in the Pepco service area. To be eligible to participate in the Pepco Customer Relief Fund, a customer must meet the following criteria:   

  • Active residential customer  
  • 60+ days past due  
  • Carry a balance of at least $250 
  • Household that is either limited income or moderate-income
    • Limited income is based on existing state LIHEAP eligibility (200% of Federal Poverty Level)
    • Moderate income level includes those making 400% of Federal Poverty Level

Fund allocation details:   

  • One-time per household; up to $300 per-household grant 
  • Approved grants will be credited to customers’ Pepco account 

Pepco Customer Relief Fund | Pepco – An Exelon Company

BGE Customer Relief Fund

We are pleased to share that applications are officially open for the BGE Customer Relief Fund—a vital initiative made possible by a one-time charitable donation from Exelon, BGE’s parent company, to the United Way of Central Maryland.

This fund is designed to provide direct financial assistance to eligible low- and middle-income customers in central Maryland who are facing challenges due to rising energy supply costs. Qualified applicants may receive between $250 and $750 in energy bill assistance.

Customers can apply by visiting mdutilityrelief.org.

Applications will be accepted through September 30, 2025, or until all funds are distributed.

Due to high interest, some users may experience intermittent access issues when using the application system, which is managed by United Way. While BGE does not control the platform, we are actively working with United Way to support their efforts and help ensure a smooth customer experience.

This fund is part of BGE’s broader commitment to energy affordability and community support. For more information on additional assistance programs, customers can visit BGE.com/heretohelp.

Thank you for your continued partnership as we work together to provide meaningful relief to those who need it most.

Press Release: BGE and United Way of Central Maryland Open Applications for Direct Assistance Through New $15 Million BGE Customer Relief Fund | BGE – An Exelon Company

Launching 2026 reelection campaign

I’m very excited to announce that I filed reelection campagin along with my wonderful D9 teammates: Senator Katie Fry Hester, Delegates Courtney Watson and Natalie Ziegler.

It has been my honor to represent our district and I hope to earn your support again in 2026!

2025 End of Session D9 Townhall

2025 End of Session D9 Townhall

  • District 9 End of Session Community Meeting

Join us for a comprehensive recap of the 2025 legislative session with all District 9 legislators. 

Date: 7:00-8:30 PM, Monday, April 28, 2025

Location: Roger Carter Community Center (in old Ellicott City) 

Address: 3000 Milltown Dr, Ellicott City, MD 21043