Howard County
Analysis of Howard County Maryland Expenditure on Public Schools, FY2009 – FY2025
Analysis of Howard County Maryland Expenditure on Public Schools, FY2009 – FY2025
by Anthony Debella
The factor discussed here is: HCPSS funding from the county divided by county total operating budget. I did not cross-check the data. However, I had similar conclusion when I was on the school board.
From the analysis, we can see that the share(percentage) of county funding used for HCPSS is decreasing over years, from high of 61% to 54% now. Now, 1% means 15 million dollars.
If the county could restore 61% operating budget to HCPSS, that is 15*7=105 million extra money for HCPSS.
Ranked–Choice Voting for Howard County – Board of Education Elections –
Howard County – Board of Education Elections – Ranked–Choice Voting
Here is the bill:
Primer of Ranked Choice Voting
Our team created a four-page PowerPoint slides to explain ranked choice voting.
Here is an article by Frank Hecker which talks about RCV.
A better way to elect the Howard County Board of Education – FrankHecker.com
Howard County 2022 In-process and Planned Development
This is a long list (30 pages) for in-process and planned development for Howard County this year. It showed where the new units will be built and which school is designated to go.
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Board with additional supporting documentation for the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) School Capacity Chart.
Howard County Preliminary FY 2023 Fiscal Outlook
superintendent 2023 HCPSS budget
superintendent 2023 HCPSS budget

The presentation is here
The full budget book is here:
Howard County APFO 101
Howard County APFO ( adequate public facility ordinance) 101
The Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) provides a growth management process that will enable the County to provide adequate public roads, schools, and other facilities in a timely manner and achieve general plan growth objectives. This process is designed to direct growth to areas where adequate infrastructure exists or will exist.

My APFO questions
On Monday, BOE and County Council had a conversation on the APFO. I raised a few questions:
- In the overarching objective, I did not see “meet residents’ needs” as a goal of APFO.
- The low impact fee or surcharge fee is a huge problem for the long deferred maintenance we are facing now. HCPSS is in a crisis of overcrowded and short of capital project funding. Schools we are building now will need significant renovation in 20 years, which is actually quicker than many people think. Our newest, Marriotts Ridge High School, many people still feel it is new, actually was built in 2005 and it is 16 years old already.
- In the traffic study section, I strongly opposed that traffic study was paid and presented by the developers themselves. The study should be impartial. The county should collect fees from developers and outsource that study to a third independent party. The same principles should apply to other studies too.
- There is a problem using the resale and new development yield number as presented for the county to project new housing student yield. The yield for new house development only consider the first year number and did not consider the accumulated impact.
Attached please see the latest APFO.
Please share your feedback with us. I am going to have some further discussions with county council members on this.
Charter School Application (Reading Opens Doors Charter School) and Update
HCPSS BOE is receiving its first charter school application, at least in my term. Here it is the application document for discussion on Thursday May 27, 2021. The school will be located in Elkridge and focus on students with needs.
The report provides the evaluation of the Reading Opens Doors, Inc charter school application. The original letter of intent and application were received on August 7, 2020 with the final application documents received on March 4, 2021. The applicant’s focus is to maximize the academic abilities of K-5th vulnerable and marginalized children and help them to pursue their dreams.
Here is the application pdf file.
Evaluation Result and Application Document

Final Vote
On Dec. 7, 2021, the board voted unanimously to disapprove the application.
Report of School Planning from Howard County Strategic Advisory Group
The intent of APFO, first adopted in 1992, is to limit and pace development evenly over time so the County can plan, budget, and construct capital facilities for schools, roads, water and sewer, parks, public safety, and other public infrastructure. This process is designed to direct growth to areas where adequate infrastructure exists or will exist.
If not, the project remains on hold for another year. Projects can be held up to a maximum of five tests due to closed schools (generally 3 to 4 years).
HIGHLIGHT: This means that even if the schools still do not have adequate capacity after five tests, the development project may proceed nonetheless.
In a rapid developing county, HCPSS has been always catching up with funding and capacity.
School-Planning-in-Howard-County-SAG-Educational-Piece-May-2021Download

The Housing Opportunity Master Plan for Howard County with my comments

Who are on the committee?
Maybe I missed, I did not see any Asian Americans on this committee, nor Latino Americans.

Some comments on the challenges raised in the report
CHALLENGE #1: LAND USE, PLANNING, AND ZONING
Housing supply has not kept up with housing demand, particularly over the last decade and given recent employment growth. This imbalance between supply and demand is leading to rising affordability issues.
Wu Comment: what is the goal (balance point) for the demand and need? If we don’t define it, we will see this argument for life.
CHALLENGE #2: LAND USE, PLANNING, AND ZONING
A lack of housing diversity throughout Howard County inhibits racial and socioeconomic integration. Historically disadvantaged populations, lower-income households and households experiencing poverty find that most of the housing options affordable to them are concentrated in only a few locations. This challenge is especially problematic considering that most remaining land and school capacity is in the Rural West, where current zoning regulations largely prohibit affordable housing development of any kind.
Wu Comment: But they are keeping building low-income houses in a few buildings in the Columbia downtown area, instead those should be spreat out. The newly proposed policies keep the same old, ill-practice.
CHALLENGE #3: LAND USE, PLANNING, AND ZONING
New development today is less diverse than the housing inventory overall. In recent years, new development has shifted in favor of rental apartments, and—at the same time—the for-sale market has largely stopped building smaller, attainably priced for-sale housing.
Wu Comment: there are only limited lands available and only 7% land left for development in Howard County.
CHALLENGE #4: PROGRAMS AND POLICIES
Howard County lacks a cohesive strategy for prioritization, policy/program design, and resource allocation.
Wu Comment: The policies are driven by developers such that loophole and exception everywhere.
CHALLENGE #5: PROGRAMS AND POLICIES
Existing resources are not sufficient to meet current and future capacity and demands (e.g., schools, transportation, etc.) while also dedicating funds to housing goals.
Wu Comment: That is the reason we need slow down new development to make sure the current school capacity and infrastructure to catch up first. Keeping building more and we will never catch up.
CHALLENGE #6: PROGRAMS AND POLICIES
It continues to be difficult to supply housing for diverse populations, with significant needs going forward.
Wu Comment: this is a very vague statement and it be applied anywhere they see fit.
CHALLENGE #7: PROGRAMS AND POLICIES
The COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic disruption is exposing and exacerbating housing insecurity.
Wu Comment: This is true.
- Housing security actually relates to job security. Sometimes policy with good intention can lead to larger harm. Remembering the 2008 finance crisis which crippled many many families, was built on the assumption: everyone should buy a house.
- Another is a sound personal financial management. How to spend the money we have wisely is not an easy task.
CHALLENGE #8: PROGRAMS AND POLICIES
A large portion of housing that is affordable to low- and moderate-income households in Howard County is older and at risk of deterioration and/or redevelopment going forward.
Wu Comment:
- Yes. We need revitalization on those houses with policy, monetary and community support.
- Look at the affordable housing debate in 2016, a proposal by Council Member, now state delegate Jen Terrasa where the proposal required 15% affordable units in all new housing development. It did not pass the county council. Here is the article I wrote at that time: https://chaowu.org/2016/07/27/columbias-downtown-and-affordable-housing/
- Another event showed developers’ influence during the last APFO update vote. The developers were sitting in the George Howard Building. In that night past 12 o’clock, some of them shouted on social media: your vote was illegitimate because of some procedure violation. I could not recall much detail for that night now unfortunately.
CHALLENGE #9: HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE
The Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (“APFO”) is placing significant limitations on the amount of housing that can be built, and it is
potentially accelerating those capacity issues by limiting the ability to increase the tax base.
Wu Comment: New housing development could not pay for itself, neither school funding nor other infrastructure cost. Here is my calculation for your reference: https://chaowu.org/2021/05/10/some-math-about-hcpss-funding-needs-and-gaps/
The whole report is here:
HoCo County Council Bill CB 24-2021
HoCo County Council Bill CB 24-2021
CB24-2021 has two amendment areas.
- The first addresses the addition of a public ethics report to be made by applicants for development regarding campaign contributions/business with County Council members and/or the County Executive.
- The second would prohibit action on proposed zoning regulation amendments during a period leading up to the adoption of a new Howard County General Plan (specifically, nine years after the implementation of the current plan up until the new plan is adopted – this plan is currently on a 10-year cycle, thus this would apply one year before adoption).
While staff cannot estimate a direct impact on HCPSS without knowing what proposed regulations may be delayed by the bill, generally they would agree with the notion that if changes to the General Plan are imminent within the next year, passing new zoning regulations may be counterintuitive to the purpose of the plan itself to provide guidance.
The video is here:
FY 2022 Spending Affordability Advisory Committee Report
Howard County Demographic & Land Use Trends & General Plan Update FY 2022
FY2022 Howard County Debt Affordability Presentation (SAAC)
Howard County Economic Outlook from SAAC presentation
We have two presentations talking about HoCo Economic outlook
4th SAAC Presentation materials-12/17/2020
SAAC Meeting Schedule
- 19-Nov 7:00-9:00am General and fiscal update
- 3-Dec 7:00-9:00am CIP – Education
- 10-Dec 7:00-9:00am CIP – Infrastructure
- 17-Dec 7:00-9:00am CIP – Infrastructure / other big projects
- 7-Jan 7:00-9:00am Commercial Base & Business
- 14-Jan 7:00-9:00am Operating budget – Overview & Education
- 21-Jan 7:00-9:00am Operating budget – Other Agencies
- 28-Jan 7:00-9:00am Economic Outlook & Long-Term Demographic/Development Trends
- 4-Feb 7:00-9:00am Revenue, Debt, Multi-Year Projections
- 11-Feb 7:00-9:00am Recommendations for the Report
- 25-Feb 7:00-9:00am Report Writing – Draft review
Two presentations on December 12, 2020
Howard County Office of Transportation
FY 2022 Presentation to Spending Affordability Advisory Committee – December 17, 2020
Ellicott City Flood Mitigation















